Christopher Browne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > d) A *major* merit to the "each transaction a directory" idea is that > it makes it easy to manipulate the data structures by hand or by > script whilst the program is running. Until someone hacks a Guile > Listener into GnuCash, the ability to hack on the data from the UNIX > side of things is Very Valuable. Could we talk a bit more here about what would be most useful? In the next month I might have some time to do something about this. Are you talking about something like a "gnucash-eval ..." shell command (like the one scwm has)? -- Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PGP=E80E0D04F521A094 532B97F5D64E3930 -- Gnucash Developer's List To unsubscribe send empty email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: date range in register. Rob Walker
- Transaction Locking Christopher Browne
- Re: Transaction Locking Derek Atkins
- Directories as Transactions (or vice versa... Christopher Browne
- Re: Directories as Transactions (or vi... Russell Nelson
- Re: Directories as Transactions (or vi... Rob Walker
- Re: Directories as Transactions (or vi... Christopher Browne
- Re: Directories as Transactions (or vi... Russell Nelson
- Re: Directories as Transactions (or vi... linas
- Re: Directories as Transactions (or vi... Derek Atkins
- Guile Listener Rob Browning
- Guile Listener Christopher Browne
- Re: Guile Listener Rob Browning
- Re: Guile Listener Dave Peticolas
- Re: Guile Listener Rob Browning
- Re: Guile Listener Christopher Browne
- Re: Transaction Locking linas
- Re: Transaction Locking Rob Browning
- Database Backends Christopher Browne
- Re: Database Backends Rob Browning
- Re: Transaction Locking Rob Browning