On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 7:07 AM, Yavor Doganov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > В Fri, 11 Apr 2008 18:42:15 -0400, Hubert Chathi написа: > > > On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 09:08:52 +0000 (UTC), Yavor Doganov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >>> or http://price.sourceforge.net/exception.html > > > > > What problems do you see with it? > > IMVHO such an exception *might* fix one side of the problem, but the > resulting combined work still violates LGPLv3, which in turn is GPLv3 > with additional permissions. >
YAVHO but I thoght that the (l)gplv2 conflicted with the (l)gplv3 and not the other way around due to the no additional requirements portion of the (l)gplv2 and the additional requirements of the (l)gplv3
_______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
