В Mon, 14 Apr 2008 07:41:36 -0700, Matt Rice написа: > but I thoght that the (l)gplv2 conflicted with the (l)gplv3 and not the > other way around
I don't think so: ,---- http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html ---- | GNU General Public License (GPL) version 2 | | Please note that GPLv2 is, by itself, not compatible with GPLv3. | However, most software released under GPLv2 allows you to use the | terms of later versions of the GPL as well. When this is the case, | you can use the code under GPLv3 to make the desired combination. | | | GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL) version 3 | | This is the latest version of the LGPL: a free software license, but | not a strong copyleft license, because it permits linking with | non-free modules. It is compatible with GPLv3. We recommend it for | special circumstances only. | | Please note that LGPLv3 is not compatible with GPLv2 by itself. | However, most software released under GPLv2 allows you to use the | terms of later versions of the GPL as well. When this is the case, | you can use the code under GPLv3 to make the desired combination. `---- See also http://www.gnu.org/licenses/rms-why-gplv3.html, specifically the third paragraph. _______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
