Running this in my VM, with remote X11, there is slight lag (as I'd
expect from remote X11) and resizing the splitview makes my CPU usage
jump to a massive 1.9%.
I realise that this is a massive overhead, and suggest that we
consider very carefully whether it is worth the extra cost.
David
On 14 May 2009, at 21:49, Riccardo Mottola wrote:
Hmm,
I prefer not to have them live... it disturbs me.
Besides, 1ghz is slow for a desktop perhaps, but for some netbook it
is not.
--Riccardo
Hi,
I'm ready to commit this patch, but I wanted to give the heads up
before...
This basically remove the reverse splitview bar we draw to instead do
live resizing.
It's reasonably fast, tested on slow-ish machines (~1ghz x86 & ppc),
and makes things much nicer from a UI point of view.
Comments before I submit ? :)
_______________________________________________
Gnustep-dev mailing list
Gnustep-dev@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
_______________________________________________
Gnustep-dev mailing list
Gnustep-dev@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
