We probably should have created a branch for the stable state and done the release from there.
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 4:39 PM, Fred Kiefer <fredkie...@gmx.de> wrote: > Looks like we have more commit right now during code freeze then we have > at normal times. I would suggest that we give up the idea of doing more > tests. As long as people cannot stick to a code freeze even for a week, > we wont have any stable state that is worth testing. As far as we are > aware all the bugs introduced freshly with Richard's and to a lesser > extend my restructuring should be fixed by now. We will find out about > other problems that went in with the recent commits soon enough. > > A the situation isn't improving with more waiting, I think we should > make a release now and then try to get in all the other important stuff > and make another pre-release before the gui/back 1.0. > > Fred > > > _______________________________________________ > Gnustep-dev mailing list > Gnustep-dev@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev > -- Gregory Casamento - GNUstep Lead/Principal Consultant, OLC, Inc. yahoo/skype: greg_casamento, aol: gjcasa (240)274-9630 (Cell) -- Gregory Casamento - GNUstep Lead/Principal Consultant, OLC, Inc. yahoo/skype: greg_casamento, aol: gjcasa (240)274-9630 (Cell) _______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev