The feature freeze only includes core (make, base, gui and back). I don't really consider the WinUXTheme (or any of the themes) to be part of the freeze, so your changes are fine where they are.
I should have been more concise about the scope of the freeze I wanted in the first place. That would have avoided some of the current confusion. I would like Doug to send the patches he's got in mind to Fred for review and testing. GC On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 2:04 PM, Eric Wasylishen <ewasylis...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sorry, two of my recent theme-related commits were probably inappropriate to > make during the feature freeze (adding an option to disable the inner > border in NSScrollView, and moving NSBrowser header drawing to GSTheme). I > can revert these if you'd like. > Doug: the Windows menu fixes sound great. I was noticing a lot of menu > flickering with the WinUX theme, and mousewheel scrolling in Ink was really > laggy - I bet your patch will fix those problems. > Eric > On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 11:32 AM, Gregory Casamento > <greg.casame...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I believe that "feature freeze" is the correct term and what I was >> really after when I suggested the freeze. I'm comfortable with any >> changes that fix or improve existing functionality so long as: >> >> 1) they don't add new features and >> 2) They don't involve drastic refactoring of existing code. >> >> GC -- Gregory Casamento - GNUstep Lead/Principal Consultant, OLC, Inc. yahoo/skype: greg_casamento, aol: gjcasa (240)274-9630 (Cell) _______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev