On 7 Jan 2014, at 10:26, Ivan Vučica <[email protected]> wrote: > "Post-2007 features in language and language runtime"?
I read this as 'we support a 6-year old version of the language! Yay!' > I'd however go with Objective-C 2.0. Apple may have stopped using the name, > but it is still a good historical descriptor without a suitable replacement. > It is also a good name to point out a difference from a much simpler language > (and runtime) that existed prior to that point. I read 'Objective-C 2' as 'we support the features Apple introduced in 2005! Yay!' Neither of these are the impression that we want to give. David -- Sent from my PDP-11 _______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
