On 7 Jan 2014, at 10:37, David Chisnall <thera...@sucs.org> wrote: > On 7 Jan 2014, at 10:26, Ivan Vučica <ivuc...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> "Post-2007 features in language and language runtime"? > > I read this as 'we support a 6-year old version of the language! Yay!' > >> I'd however go with Objective-C 2.0. Apple may have stopped using the name, >> but it is still a good historical descriptor without a suitable replacement. >> It is also a good name to point out a difference from a much simpler >> language (and runtime) that existed prior to that point. > > I read 'Objective-C 2' as 'we support the features Apple introduced in 2005! > Yay!'
You may be unusual in that. > Neither of these are the impression that we want to give. How about 'Objective-C: The Next Generation' :-) _______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
