On Tuesday, January 7, 2014 09:37 CET, David Chisnall <thera...@sucs.org> wrote: > On 7 Jan 2014, at 08:23, Sebastian Reitenbach <sebas...@l00-bugdead-prods.de> > wrote: > > > * better OBJC2 support, some more proper gs-make support > > A minor point, but Apple hasn't used the term 'Objective-C 2' for over five > years. Possibly because they were mocked for describing the version of > Objective-C that came after Objective-C 4 as Objective-C 2... > > The main point that we want to be making today is that we support ARC. We > might want some bullet-point features, such as: > > - ARC > - Blocks > - Properties > - Braindead array and dictionary syntax with poorly thought out semantics > added to appease Python programmers
But what would then be a "better" name for it? Just "modern objc runtime"? Or something that would describe it in one word, suitable as a menu entry? cheers, Sebastian > > Or, more simply, all of the language features that are supported on OS X with > the latest Apple tools. > > David > > -- Sent from my Difference Engine > > > _______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev