Bosco, Thanks for calling me pro-science and logical. It is quite possible that you would entirely ignore the following questions of M. Goveia because they are based on imaginary thoughts and fictitious premises. But even if you do so, I hope you would at least praise M. Goveia for his innovative sense of logic and his uncanny ability to fabricate new information.
He is understandably envious about the undeserved praises that you have showered on me. It is unfair that you have not adequately complimented him for his valiant efforts at putting his words in other people's mouths. Cheers, Santosh Mario Goveia wrote > > > Bosco, > How is it "pro-science" and "logical" for anyone > with > a Ph.D. to argue that a rock solid moral code often > developed over centuries of shared experience > represents a "fake morality" and is invalid because > a > few individuals who have subscribed to the code are > either guilty of transgressions, or even ALLEGED to > be > guilty? > > > How is it "pro-science" and "logical" for anyone > with > a Ph.D. to INSIST that all unorganised individual > atheists worldwide have arrived at their beliefs > through independent study, research and deep > reflection and introspection, when neither he nor > anyone else has any way of knowing this? > _______________________________________________ Goanet mailing list Goanet@lists.goanet.org http://lists.goanet.org/listinfo.cgi/goanet-goanet.org
