The post appended below is full of mind-numbing contradictions. For example, here are two sentences that contradict each other:
"Theology works together with modern sciences, empirical, social, historical, archaeological." ...Fr. Ivo "Science cannot have a say on "supernatural", by the simple fact that empirical Science deals with natural phenomena. It has no say about Reincarnation, Resurrection, existence of God, miracles." ...Fr. Ivo The following quote, in addition to contradicting the above statement, shows once again a lack of understanding of what is meant by the scientific method: "There are other scientific methods, where there is also observation, classification, verification, prediction, which will vary for miraculous cases." ...Fr. Ivo Finally, here is another example wherein, despite stating above that science has no say in miracles, Fr. Ivo claims that scientific tests have been conducted on 126 miracles, implying that science confirms their authenticity: "In the history there are already 126 Eucharistic miracles at various times and places. In all cases scientific tests have been conducted. If we compare them, in all these cases there is a change from host to flesh and blood." ...Fr. Ivo The above also raises the suspicion that he gets his "scientific" information from religious websites, and as I mentioned in my earlier post, that he uncritically believes everything he reads on those sites. Cheers, Santosh --- On Wed, 9/3/08, Fr. Ivo C da Souza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ***Wrong. You cannot make gratuitous, > 'non-scientific" affirmations. You do > not understand > what you are talking about. I am sorry to say. You do not > understand your > own scientific principles. >
