Without apologies, I am linking to the official Google survey... LOL
What changes would improve Go most ?
#1. 572 (16%) generics
(https://blog.golang.org/survey2016-results)
Whoops ;)
So you mean that 16% of us are so stupid we don't want to copy paste the
code and adjust it, or use slowinterfaces ?
Btw, just a silly question, but I wrongly assumed that a direct call to
instantiated type-specific code was much faster than an indirect call to an
interface.
So you mean that the following code is much faster than type-specific
code, right, and therefore this is the adviced way to format variables ?
var i interface{} = 23
fmt.Printf("%v\n", i)
(https://golang.org/pkg/fmt/)
OMG, that's really great, thanks !!! Because it was quite error prone to
copy-paste the repeated code and adjust it manually. Thank you so much, you
made my day :)
I was so stupid, thanks for showing my the right way to optimize reused
code.
On Sunday, July 30, 2017 at 12:02:04 AM UTC+1, Shawn Milochik wrote:
Without apologies, I am linking to a post I wrote seconds ago regarding
> generics.
>
> It applies here equally. Perhaps more so, since the percentage of
> brace-complainers is a tiny fraction of the percentage of generics-whiners:
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/golang-nuts/hQiZsd1ZRdA/DSgV7CX7BwAJ
>
>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
