I wrote a proposal with function-scope named handlers that uses a per-call try flag and offers most features of 'catch', but it hasn't received any attention... https://github.com/golang/go/issues/27519
On Saturday, June 29, 2019 at 12:45:37 PM UTC-7, Robert Engels wrote: > > If you don’t understand the history you are doomed to repeat it. The ‘try’ > proposal is barely better than the current situation. There is as a reason > exception handling with try catch was designed along with OO. It simplifies > error handling immensely. “Try” as you might, you might think you are > improving on it, but you’re not. > > Go should implement caught exceptions and be done with it. Stop trying to > be cute. Take what works elsewhere and stop thinking you’re always the > smartest person in the room. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/7e3c1225-cc66-4bd0-b8f7-250ee5bb0e53%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
