On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 3:43 AM Ian Lance Taylor <i...@golang.org> wrote:
> > Checked exceptions address some of the difficulties with exceptions. > However, they introduce new difficulties, and I do not believe they > work in large-scale programs. It is essentially a nominal effect system on exceptions. My bet is we are better off it is was structural and thus automatically inferred by the compiler. There is also the point that an exception must be a shared secret between a raiser and a handler[0], which somewhat argues against the notion of a checked exception in the first place. [0] https://existentialtype.wordpress.com/2012/12/03/exceptions-are-shared-secrets/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/CAGrdgiXaJX4tnOUebn2FVgYGcB174OaaNsadWxdx8iMHWctZkw%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
