> Exception handling when properly done is beautiful. Yes and so are: - C++ templates - Python meta-classes - Scheme hygienic macros
but that doesn't mean Go would be improved by adding them. On Friday, July 5, 2019 at 6:46:49 PM UTC-4, robert engels wrote: > > If you’ve suffered through bad code due to exceptions, you would just be > trading one ill for another. Exception handling when properly done is > beautiful. Yes, a lot of people get it wrong, but they would probably get a > lot of other things wrong as well. At least with exceptions, you have a > stack trace - usually - :) - to help you figure out what they did wrong. > > > On Jul 5, 2019, at 5:29 PM, andrey mirtchovski <mirtc...@gmail.com > <javascript:>> wrote: > > > >> So I was quiet on the topic then - I am not now. > > > > i guess you missed the point where I advocated for a new survey, well > > advertised, where all the people who are fervent Go programmers but > > somehow neglected to fill out the Go surveys for three years running > > can cast their voice. "does go error handling need change: ◻️yes ◻️no > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "golang-nuts" group. > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send > an email to golan...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>. > > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/CAK4xykXEtQZKeqyC8kLoHfokySD2xDzqY91hTz9_hMX%3DdkKtQg%40mail.gmail.com. > > > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/c1c2b2db-b847-4cd9-80a6-317603d870d4%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
