(sorry space a, i didn't reply to list)
hi alex and space a.
as far as i know there is no reason that anybody has to write code with
generics when they are available. therefor i really don't understand the
negative mails to this list.
do you also want others not to use them? how would that help you? could
you please explain to me your personal gain if generics are not added to
go and not available to me and other users? many users have valid use
cases for generics and custom code generation to deal with them now.
i personally never had a reason to use imaginary numbers in go, they are
however part of the language as literals and accompanied by special
built-ins. should i care, do you?
please explain
On 13.03.21 12:34, Space A. wrote:
There is no rationale. They decided, and they implemented. No one from
Go team ever took the argument against it seriously because "community"
demands, blabla. And because Russ Cox with friends written an academic
paper so this is now a question of pure science. Write your own and they
could listen. (No)
суббота, 13 марта 2021 г. в 10:07:44 UTC+3, alex-coder:
Hello,
Thank you for the answers.
Now I have something to read. :-)
So, sorry for my English.
Personally, I would add a dynamic dispatching into GO
and left language without generic in order to keep simplicity for GO
and to make life of the applied programmers easier :-)
What I'm looking for is the rationale behind the technical decision
to understand why the sort of decision has been taken.
Thank you again for the answers.
On Saturday, March 13, 2021 at 7:15:06 AM UTC+3 Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 7:31 AM alex-coder <a.gus...@gmail.com>
wrote:
>
> Hello again,
> I apologize for being so intrusive.
> Where it is possible to read about the evaluations of labor
and complexity for
> GO itself for different implementations to introduce generic
in GO ?
LIke others, I'm not quite sure what you are asking, but perhaps
you
want to look at
https://go.googlesource.com/proposal/+/refs/heads/master/design/generics-implementation-stenciling.md
<https://go.googlesource.com/proposal/+/refs/heads/master/design/generics-implementation-stenciling.md>
https://go.googlesource.com/proposal/+/refs/heads/master/design/generics-implementation-dictionaries.md
<https://go.googlesource.com/proposal/+/refs/heads/master/design/generics-implementation-dictionaries.md>
https://go.googlesource.com/proposal/+/refs/heads/master/design/generics-implementation-gcshape.md
<https://go.googlesource.com/proposal/+/refs/heads/master/design/generics-implementation-gcshape.md>
Ian
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
<mailto:golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/8abb7704-ae60-4085-a7d7-0a8f7534e35dn%40googlegroups.com
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/8abb7704-ae60-4085-a7d7-0a8f7534e35dn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/c67e637e-6eea-de85-1d43-e2d775424044%40mb0.org.
