Hi Jeremy. There is nothing dictating that GWT applications must use App
Engine as a back-end. App Engine does have several unique advantages, and
we're definitely trying to make it easier to integrate GWT with App Engine,
but if you have an adequate back-end system already set up and don't care to
do the refactoring necessary to use App Engine's datastore, then you can
look into using GWT standalone.
- Jason

On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 8:42 PM, jeremy rose <jeremy.rosenb...@gmail.com>wrote:

>
>
> On Sep 15, 3:32 am, leszek <leszek.ptokar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Nobody can contradict that DataNucleus is a high quality software. The
> > fact that it is Google's persistence provider of choice speaks for
> > itself.
>
> I haven't had the pleasure of really using DataNucleus (at least not
> yet) but I'm willing to believe its great software.  I'm just a bit
> perplexed by step one of the development process (at least using GWT
> with appengine) being migrate your data to a different database (even
> if it is technologically superior).   Obviously, the target is green
> field development where "mega-bunches" of data haven't already been
> collected from prior work.
>
> Jeremy
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine for Java" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to