Hi Jeremy. There is nothing dictating that GWT applications must use App Engine as a back-end. App Engine does have several unique advantages, and we're definitely trying to make it easier to integrate GWT with App Engine, but if you have an adequate back-end system already set up and don't care to do the refactoring necessary to use App Engine's datastore, then you can look into using GWT standalone. - Jason
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 8:42 PM, jeremy rose <jeremy.rosenb...@gmail.com>wrote: > > > On Sep 15, 3:32 am, leszek <leszek.ptokar...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Nobody can contradict that DataNucleus is a high quality software. The > > fact that it is Google's persistence provider of choice speaks for > > itself. > > I haven't had the pleasure of really using DataNucleus (at least not > yet) but I'm willing to believe its great software. I'm just a bit > perplexed by step one of the development process (at least using GWT > with appengine) being migrate your data to a different database (even > if it is technologically superior). Obviously, the target is green > field development where "mega-bunches" of data haven't already been > collected from prior work. > > Jeremy > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine for Java" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---