i agree. should be called different. call it gJava, googleJava or whatever.
bye, NM On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 3:17 PM, Diana Cruise <diana.l.cru...@gmail.com>wrote: > I'm curious which classes you are referring to that are missing and > are NOT considered a stability risk running under a shared app server > environment. We are developing in Java with this solution so I don't > mind the naming...I have yet to need a class not offered, guess I have > been lucky :) > > So, what would you recommend calling it? > > On Nov 27, 12:04 pm, jago <java.j...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > this is not Java! The whitelist is ridiculous: > http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/java/jrewhitelist.html > > > > There is so much missing I don't even know where to start. Is there an > > issue I can star that extends the whitelist to the full Java6 lib? > > > > This is destroying the Java standard and shouldn't be called Java. > > Every other company that tries to do an implementation of Java and > > call it Java gets a massive punch from Sun. Why is Google allowed to > > use Java6 with a whitelist and still call it Java? > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google App Engine for Java" group. > To post to this group, send email to > google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<google-appengine-java%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en. > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine for Java" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
