Actually, many people had the same reaction when GAE/J was released. See for instance, http://weblogs.java.net/blog/2009/04/16/google-app-engine-java-sucks
Without a doubt if some smaller player created such an incompatible implementation they would not be allowed to call it 'Java'. On Nov 27, 7:19 pm, Diana Cruise <diana.l.cru...@gmail.com> wrote: As far > as the naming goes, you may be the first to raise this concern in > GAE's existence (2 years or so). > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine for Java" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
