Hi Manu,

For now you can get things working again by replacing lines 36 and 37
of bookmark.py with this:
---
    def __init__(self, kind, filters={}, _app=None, keys_only=False):
        super(BookmarkQuery, self).__init__(kind, filters, _app, keys_only)
---

-Nick Johnson

On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Manu <manuelar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> the code for BookmarkQuery is here:
> http://bitbucket.org/moraes/appengine/src/422cc9b9473b/bookmark.py
>
>
> I'm using it but haven't developed it myself, so I don't really know
> how it works.
> Please help me, isn't there a way to quickly fix this at least for the
> moment?
> Thanks in advance!
>
> Manuel
>
>
>
> On 8 mayo, 02:05, ryan <ryanb+appeng...@google.com> wrote:
>> hi manuel! we pushed a new version of our API code to production
>> recently in preparation for an upcoming release, which has caused
>> problems for people who use forked versions of some of our API code,
>> like the problem described 
>> inhttp://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine/browse_thread/thread/...
>> , or code that reaches below our API layer, which it sounds like
>> BookmarkQuery does.
>>
>> i don't have the BookmarkQuery source, so i don't know the exact fix
>> you need, but the problem stems from a new optional keyword argument
>> that we added to the Query classes' constructors. try adding a
>> keys_only=None parameter to BookmarkQuery's constructor and see if
>> that helps.
> 

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to