App engine is made for people who love to code and learn new things on their own. Not for people who want everything coded for them. For that go to http://wordpress.com .
Also app engine documentation is improving. If you want examples go here: http://code.google.com/p/google-app-engine-samples/ On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 6:21 AM, Holger <w...@arcor.de> wrote: > > Dear djidjadji, > > you do a great expert work, but sometimes experts got blind, loosing > their feeling for the real world. > > This happened IBM when inventing the two letters p and c and being > overcome my Bill. > > That happened to Bill when being overcome by these Google guys > > Shall that happen to Google too ? > > - > > Naturally writing your explanations not for your own 100,000 experts > who don't really need such explanation but for these 100.000.000 mass > customers Google should have in mind, that isn't possible with the > abstract scientific explanation style you follow now. > > You really need to be creative and find better ways of explanation. > What about downloadable example code working out of the box for every > programming step? Would that blow up your explanations to books? > > - > > What you really need is a feeling for your customers. As long as you > inwardly are laughing on your dump customers and deliver links lists > http://lmgtfy.com/?q=PYTHONPATH > whose second target reads: > 'Please, only post meaningful and useful information.' > (http://blenderartists.org/forum/showthread?t=7412 - in fact humans > usually read only three lines of text, what comes later is useless.) > > you are in great danger to be overcome soon by somebody more clever > then Google. > > Kind regards, > Holger > > > Dear djidjadji, > > you do a great expert work, but sometimes experts got blind, loosing > their feeling for the real world. > > This happened IBM when inventing the two letters p and c and beeing > overcome my Bill. > > That happened Bill when beeing overcome by these google guys > > Shall that happen Google too ? > > - > > Naturally writing your explanations not for your own 100,000 experts > who don't really need such explanation but for these 100.000.000 mass > customers Google should have in mind, that isn't possible with the > abstract scientific explanation style you follow now. > > You really need to be creative and find better ways of explanation. > What about downloadable example code working out of the box for every > programming step? Would that blow up your explanations to books? > > - > > What you really need is a feeling for your customers. As long as you > inwardly are laughing on your dump customers and deliver links lists > http://lmgtfy.com/?q=PYTHONPATH > whose second targed reads: > 'Please, only post meaningful and useful information.' > (http://blenderartists.org/forum/showthread?t=7412) > > you are in great danger to be overcome soon by somebody more clever > then Google. > > Kind regards, > Holger > > > > On Jul 25, 8:31 am, djidjadji <djidja...@gmail.com> wrote: > > If every GAE page was written for the python starter it would be a big > book. > > You could follow this link > > > > http://lmgtfy.com/?q=PYTHONPATH > > > > 2009/7/25 Holger <w...@arcor.de>: > > > > -- Hrishikesh Bakshi --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
