Hmm. It looks like I should've read through the datastore specs prior to uploading so much data. I will give this another run with exactly the same data but with an obfuscated class definition.
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 2:06 PM, Geoffrey Spear <geoffsp...@gmail.com>wrote: > > > On Jun 28, 1:49 pm, Nate Bauernfeind <nate.bauernfe...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Oh and does anyone know if the 500 mb in the quota usage is the 140mb of > > data replicated redundantly? I'm trying to figure out where that is > coming > > from. > > > > Or is it that the 108mb of metadata is *not* the primary indexes? > > You don't pay extra for replication of your data. > > I believe the "metadata" figure is the space taken up in the protocol > buffers by things like your application name and property names. If > you have lots tiny entities and relatively long names for things, this > can certainly be a significant proportion of your storage. The space > used by the indexes themselves is, as far as I can tell, not reported > anywhere, and only appears in the totals. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google App Engine" group. > To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<google-appengine%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
