Actually, you're right, never mind the "behind the scenes" business. But if your internal tests confirm that JARs are faster to load, please add a note to the docs, this would have saved me a lot of time experimenting with various workarounds.
Cheers, Per On Aug 20, 12:21 am, Jose Montes de Oca <jfmontesde...@google.com> wrote: > Hi Peter, > > I think we don't make this for you behind the scenes because there is an > specific use case where this would not work: For files that you want to > "override" that are already in a jar file, this files should remain in the > WEB-INF/classes folder. > > one alternative would be to modified the jar you are overriding and replace > the clase with your own. > > Best, > Jose Montes de Oca -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
