This seems like a pretty persuasive use case.
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 12:47 PM, Ray Ryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 > > For one thing, it lets UI templates set their values without requiring > custom parsers. Something like four different people have inspected the code > for problems at this point and found none. > rjrjr > > On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 12:44 PM, Emily Crutcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> +1 to >> public boolean isAutoHideEnabled() >> public boolean isModal() >> >> Why do we want to change whether auto hide/modality is enabled on an >> existing popup panel? It seems like if we do this we would need to check >> for edge cases that currently don't come up. >> >> >> On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 12:09 PM, Alex Rudnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> >>> +1, sounds like a good idea. >>> >>> On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 11:54 AM, Jason Essington >>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> > +1 here, as I've recently had to use the violator pattern to flip those >>> > bits. >>> > -jason >>> >>> -- >>> Alex Rudnick >>> swe, gwt, atl >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> "There are only 10 types of people in the world: Those who understand >> binary, and those who don't" >> >> >> > > > > -- "There are only 10 types of people in the world: Those who understand binary, and those who don't" --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
