The specific use case I was thinking of is related to an efficiency patch I was toying with that solves the occasionally-slow popup dragging case. However, Ray + Jason's use cases are much more compelling then mine anyway, especially since mine isn't implemented yet :-).
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 1:22 PM, John LaBanca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > @Emily - > > Looking at the code, I don't think there are any edge cases. We don't do > any special setup/teardown if the bits are set, we just check them in > onEventPreview. Also, I think its a valid use case to change them. For > example, if somebody offers a user defined option to enable autoHide. > > Thanks, > John LaBanca > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 1:15 PM, Ray Ryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> John, when you do this it would be a good idea to add a test that toggles >> the bits a couple of times and sees that thing still works, so that we don't >> break it later. >> rjrjr >> >> >> On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 1:14 PM, Emily Crutcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> This seems like a pretty persuasive use case. >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 12:47 PM, Ray Ryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 >>>> >>>> For one thing, it lets UI templates set their values without requiring >>>> custom parsers. Something like four different people have inspected the >>>> code >>>> for problems at this point and found none. >>>> rjrjr >>>> >>>> On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 12:44 PM, Emily Crutcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 to >>>>> public boolean isAutoHideEnabled() >>>>> public boolean isModal() >>>>> >>>>> Why do we want to change whether auto hide/modality is enabled on an >>>>> existing popup panel? It seems like if we do this we would need to check >>>>> for edge cases that currently don't come up. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 12:09 PM, Alex Rudnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> +1, sounds like a good idea. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 11:54 AM, Jason Essington >>>>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>>> > +1 here, as I've recently had to use the violator pattern to flip >>>>>> those >>>>>> > bits. >>>>>> > -jason >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Alex Rudnick >>>>>> swe, gwt, atl >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> "There are only 10 types of people in the world: Those who understand >>>>> binary, and those who don't" >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> "There are only 10 types of people in the world: Those who understand >>> binary, and those who don't" >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> > > > > -- "There are only 10 types of people in the world: Those who understand binary, and those who don't" --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
