Another thought: Christian Sedilek, Dan Kurka, and myself can also be found pretty frequently in ##gwt on irc.freenode.net for a more informal discussion - I'd love to see more steering committee members hang out there, even if just idling most of the time, and chatting once in a while.
Keeping these discussions as 'conversations' rather than as written documents probably helps them to stay a little more informal - rather than feeling like we're describing our collective vision for what GWT will be in 6, 12, 18 months, we get to be a little more interactive to hear about what people need GWT to be, and we get to float some ideas out there. From my perspective, that was an important step at the SF conf, getting us all to hear about concerns around SDM - since that panel discussion, I've switched my local development to about 80% sdm to try to come up with more concrete ways to improve how we document it and encourage people to use it. In Frankfurt, we fielded fewer online questions and got more from the room, and seemed to center around how GWT will change going forward - which browsers can be dropped, how we might continue to make Dev Mode work or otherwise keep in-IDE debugging. On Thursday, January 2, 2014 9:56:39 AM UTC-6, Daniel Kurka wrote: > > Just an idea: We could think about doing a hangout maybe every quarter > with a pre populated moderator. > > > On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Michael Prentice > <spla...@gmail.com<javascript:> > > wrote: > >> That would be great. I know that they are busy with the EU conference >> this week, but there were a lot more questions to be addressed. I already >> gave some feedback that we might need to expand the panel Q&A's next year >> (either split them by some topics or extend the time). >> >> >> On Monday, December 16, 2013 3:58:07 PM UTC-5, Boris Brudnoy wrote: >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> The closing session of the GWT.create 2013 US saw a panel of the GWT >>> Steering Committee members answer attendee questions. It so happened that >>> the issue of the changing debugging tools hijacked (most of) the >>> conversation but there were plenty more good questions the attendees >>> entered on the Moderator page for the panel: https://www.google.com/ >>> moderator/#7/e=21396f. >>> >>> I am wondering if perhaps the Steering Committee members could find time >>> to address the remaining questions in writing and, for example, post it on >>> the G+ community page? >>> >>> >>> -- >> http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "GWT Contributors" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to >> google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<javascript:> >> . >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >> > > > > -- > Google Germany GmbH > *Dienerstr. 12* > *80331 München* > > Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891 > Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg > Geschäftsführer: Graham Law, Katherine Stephens > -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Contributors" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
