Hmm. The gwt code to load the cache.html seems to be ignoring error
states:

line 315:
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/browse/trunk/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/core/linker/IFrameTemplate.js?r=5513
xhr.onreadystatechange = function() {
      // 4 == DONE
      if (xhr.readyState == 4) {

Shouldn't we add another check like:

if( xhr.status != 200 || xhr.status != 304 ) throwDocumentError();

This is probably a good thing to add in do you think?

On Aug 14, 3:30 am, Joe Cole <profilercorporat...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Is it malformed, or missing?
>
> If I remove the file (cause a 404 response) gwt doesn't throw an error
> that I can catch. I used this to reproduce the error for testing
> purposes.
> In production, the file is there, and the user has a firewall that
> blocks it and if it returns an error page, gwt doesn't throw an error
> that I can catch. I was using the missing file to replicate it
> locally.
>
> > The MD5 value is the STRONGNAME. Whether
> > you can reproduce that hash is another matter; which algorithm means
> > another trip through the source. If you can recalculate the hash,
> > you'd simply compare that value to STRONGNAME. But you'd never get a
> > chance to calculate the hash since the file's only partially received.
>
> I was hoping that the generated nocache.js would have this (or
> something) to check that the document returned by the server (or
> firewall) it loaded via xhttp was valid.
> I understand we can't regenerate it - I was trying to propose a
> solution.
> Another solution would be for the gwt script to check the response for
> an error code - is that possible?
>
> > I'm under the impression that the file's missing. In which case I'd
> > implement a watchdog timer in that routine. I'm guessing that Google
> > doesn't implement a such a timer because there's no single
> > implementation that would fit all circumstances.
>
> The file isn't missing - if I load up the cache.html file manually
> (e.g.www.mycompany.com/STRONGNAME.cache.html) at sites with a strict
> firewall we get an error document explaining that it's been blocked by
> the firewall and rationale (e.g. a high "score").
>
> > After reviewing the source, the onerror function doesn't get called
> > when you need it for this particular issue.
>
> Agreed.
>
> > Please try the cross-site linker.
>
> I've never used it before - how will this help?
>
> > I'm guessing others haven't seen this since it's specific to these
> > firewall settings? Or are these separate customers with different
> > firewalls? I have seen on this list a very difficult to reproduce
> > issue regarding RPC cargo getting truncated on the trip to the server.
> > But, obviously, that's after loading the script.
>
> These are two separate customers (one university installation, one
> corporate on separate continents).
> I have seen the truncation issue before with a personal firewall
> (Norton) as well.
>
> Thanks for your help. Apologies if you are confused!
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to