I may be treading on thin ice here but I haven't been convinced yet with the merits of MVP, particularly the one native to GWT which I find overly complex and poorly documented. I am developing a rather complex ui for an app which I had looked into using MVP for but it left me with more questions than answers. I decided to go sans MVP using a tightly coupled protocol relying on the event bus for intra view communications. Yes, I know that using junit tests are slow but then I am not sold on junit testing either as an end all to testing.
Ducking... :) On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Ernesto Reig <erniru...@gmail.com> wrote: > But what if the popup is complex enough to have its own logic? I mean, you > have a popup acting as another mini-application. For example, a popup panel > with a form asking for some input and a panel to show its search results > which the user can interact with. > Would it be correct to have its own MVP stuff (places, activities, > activityManager,etc)?? > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google Web Toolkit" group. > To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<google-web-toolkit%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. > -- *Jeff Schwartz* -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
