"Gary E. Miller" <[email protected]> writes: > Much better results than the one hour plot, but even weirder. See > attached. CEP(50) of 0.0853 m. But one excursion in Latitude of > 1.2 m, and another in Longitude of 1.1 m. Clearly not Bayesian.
As always, there is a difference between "results are consistent" and "results are correct". But without first getting consistency correct is hard to talk about. My take from watching that is that there are significant, perhaps dominant, periods when the device is in RTK FIX. And, periods when FIX is lost, and it's RTK FLOAT (or maybe maybe even just autonomous/DGPS). I find that there is a slow wander to FLOAT. It would be interesting to process the data by looking at only points in FIX, and to plot the non-FIX points separately.
