Yo Greg! On Wed, 26 Nov 2025 08:38:24 -0500 Greg Troxel <[email protected]> wrote:
> > The 1 hour plot was nothing but RTKFLT.
> >
> > The 12 hour plot was:
> >
> > 146 "status": 2, DGPS
> > 552 "status": 3, RTK FIX
> > 139602 "status": 4, RTK Float
> >
> > So the two deviantions are probably, but not required to be, status
> > related.
>
> That's interesting. Based on non-SPARTN reference data, I would
> expect the FIX points to be very tightly clustered at the cm level,
> and the FLOAT to have some wander at least 10s of cm, maybe more.
Expect? To early for me to expect.
> I suggest 3 plots, one per subset, and if possible, to force the
> origin/true-postiion of FLOAT and DGPS to be the mean for FIX.
> Or, color the dots by mode or something, but I suspect the computed
> error statistics will be wildly different.
Not high on my list. I've run out of free minutes, so no motivation
to debug their system, when I can't use it.
I can send you the raw UBX if you want to play with it.
RGDS
GARY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703
[email protected] Tel:+1 541 382 8588
Veritas liberabit vos. -- Quid est veritas?
"If you can't measure it, you can't improve it." - Lord Kelvin
pgpKNRE0pJkJ1.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
