Yo Greg! On Tue, 25 Nov 2025 17:54:26 -0500 Greg Troxel <[email protected]> wrote:
> "Gary E. Miller" <[email protected]> writes: > > > Much better results than the one hour plot, but even weirder. See > > attached. CEP(50) of 0.0853 m. But one excursion in Latitude of > > 1.2 m, and another in Longitude of 1.1 m. Clearly not Bayesian. > > As always, there is a difference between "results are consistent" and > "results are correct". But without first getting consistency correct > is hard to talk about. I prefer to say the restuls are the results. They are what they are. The hard foundation on which theories are built. > My take from watching that is that there are significant, perhaps > dominant, periods when the device is in RTK FIX. I almost never see RTKFIX. I think it is dropping into simple DGPS (SBAS) mode for a short period. > And, periods when FIX is lost, and it's RTK FLOAT (or maybe maybe even > just autonomous/DGPS). I find that there is a slow wander to FLOAT. I hace not seen fix lost. I'll see if I can write a program to extartc $ of time in each assist mode. > It would be interesting to process the data by looking at only points > in FIX, and to plot the non-FIX points separately. So yeah, when I'm guiding my car with the GPS, I'll just freeze when assist mode changes? RGDS GARY --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703 [email protected] Tel:+1 541 382 8588 Veritas liberabit vos. -- Quid est veritas? "If you can't measure it, you can't improve it." - Lord Kelvin
pgpZ1ElVyYpe9.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
