Martin Landa wrote: > Speaking about 7.0, it will take longer time to release, we would need > more active developers to cover at least basic features we would wish > for G7.
The easiest way to get more active developers for 7.0 is to cease allowing new features to be added to 6.x. Personally, I'd just kill the 6.5 branch. If something is too major to go into 6.4.x, it should be reserved for 7.0. FWIW, I don't think that fundamental changes to the raster library are feasible for 7.0. They'll just push back the release date to "never". -- Glynn Clements <gl...@gclements.plus.com> _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
