Hi, 2011/8/30 Glynn Clements <gl...@gclements.plus.com>: >> Speaking about 7.0, it will take longer time to release, we would need >> more active developers to cover at least basic features we would wish >> for G7. > > The easiest way to get more active developers for 7.0 is to cease > allowing new features to be added to 6.x. > > Personally, I'd just kill the 6.5 branch. If something is too major to > go into 6.4.x, it should be reserved for 7.0.
I don't think so, just check which people are touching trunk and devbr6 or relbr64. Closing development in 6.x will not bring anyone to trunk. The real situation is that we have too few people actively developing GRASS. That's real reason why we are so behind of basic wishes we had for GRASS 7 - at least speaking about rasters, cleaning up 3d raster lib, etc. Martin -- Martin Landa <landa.martin gmail.com> * http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/~landa _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
