On Aug 30, 2011, at 1:32 PM, Martin Landa wrote:
> Hi, > > 2011/8/30 Glynn Clements <gl...@gclements.plus.com>: >>> Speaking about 7.0, it will take longer time to release, we would need >>> more active developers to cover at least basic features we would wish >>> for G7. >> >> The easiest way to get more active developers for 7.0 is to cease >> allowing new features to be added to 6.x. >> >> Personally, I'd just kill the 6.5 branch. If something is too major to >> go into 6.4.x, it should be reserved for 7.0. > > I don't think so, just check which people are touching trunk and > devbr6 or relbr64. Closing development in 6.x will not bring anyone to > trunk. The real situation is that we have too few people actively > developing GRASS. That's real reason why we are so behind of basic > wishes we had for GRASS 7 - at least speaking about rasters, cleaning > up 3d raster lib, etc. > > Martin > > -- > Martin Landa <landa.martin gmail.com> * http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/~landa Seems an even stronger reason to focus limited development efforts on a single branch. ____________________ C. Michael Barton Director, Center for Social Dynamics & Complexity Professor of Anthropology, School of Human Evolution & Social Change Arizona State University voice: 480-965-6262 (SHESC), 480-727-9746 (CSDC) fax: 480-965-7671 (SHESC), 480-727-0709 (CSDC) www: http://www.public.asu.edu/~cmbarton, http://csdc.asu.edu _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev