Martin Landa wrote: > recently I have added a standardized option for sampling interpolation > methods [1], based on lib/raster/sample.c and codes defined in > raster.h [2]. > > Some modules use 'bicubic' other 'cubic' value. What do you think that > is more preferable?
Whichever is used, it should be consistent. I.e. either nearest/linear/cubic or nearest/bilinear/bicubic. The former might be preferable if we want to extend it to 3D interpolation (i.e. use nearest/linear/cubic regardless of the dimensionality, rather than using separate 2D/3D terminology). > It's bicubic interpolation [3] accomplished using cubic convolution, > right? Right. -- Glynn Clements <gl...@gclements.plus.com> _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
