Hi, 2013/5/16 Glynn Clements <gl...@gclements.plus.com>: > > Martin Landa wrote: > >> recently I have added a standardized option for sampling interpolation >> methods [1], based on lib/raster/sample.c and codes defined in >> raster.h [2]. >> >> Some modules use 'bicubic' other 'cubic' value. What do you think that >> is more preferable? > > Whichever is used, it should be consistent. I.e. either > nearest/linear/cubic or nearest/bilinear/bicubic. > > The former might be preferable if we want to extend it to 3D > interpolation (i.e. use nearest/linear/cubic regardless of the > dimensionality, rather than using separate 2D/3D terminology).
I fully agree, otherwise we will end up using bilinear, trilinear, bicubic and tricubic. Best regards Soeren > >> It's bicubic interpolation [3] accomplished using cubic convolution, >> right? > > Right. > > -- > Glynn Clements <gl...@gclements.plus.com> > _______________________________________________ > grass-dev mailing list > grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
