On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Sören Gebbert <soerengebb...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > 2013/5/16 Glynn Clements <gl...@gclements.plus.com>: >> >> Martin Landa wrote: >> >>> recently I have added a standardized option for sampling interpolation >>> methods [1], based on lib/raster/sample.c and codes defined in >>> raster.h [2]. >>> >>> Some modules use 'bicubic' other 'cubic' value. What do you think that >>> is more preferable? >> >> Whichever is used, it should be consistent. I.e. either >> nearest/linear/cubic or nearest/bilinear/bicubic. >> >> The former might be preferable if we want to extend it to 3D >> interpolation (i.e. use nearest/linear/cubic regardless of the >> dimensionality, rather than using separate 2D/3D terminology). > > I fully agree, otherwise we will end up using bilinear, trilinear, > bicubic and tricubic.
+1 Markus M _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
