Hi, 2013/5/16 Glynn Clements <gl...@gclements.plus.com>: > Whichever is used, it should be consistent. I.e. either > nearest/linear/cubic or nearest/bilinear/bicubic. > > The former might be preferable if we want to extend it to 3D > interpolation (i.e. use nearest/linear/cubic regardless of the > dimensionality, rather than using separate 2D/3D terminology).
OK, done in r56327, any review welcome of course. Probably would make sense to incorporate into raster lib as INTERP_TYPE (see lib/raster/sample.c) other methods, at least `lanczos`. Martin -- Martin Landa <landa.martin gmail.com> * http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/~landa _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
