On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Helmut Kudrnovsky <hel...@web.de> wrote:
> > I don't like svn in package names. Daily expresses much better what it > is. > > It is not the current state of svn, it is a daily build. With leaving out > > the daily builds of current release branch (now 70), it would be just: > > > > * `grass` - latest stable release > > * `grass6` - latest stable release of 6.x series > > * `grass-daily` - daily build of trunk > > > > In my suggestion I suppose that we don't need to package daily builds of > > current release branch (now 70). However, I'm not sure how to deal with > > betas and RCs. Should they be also accessible just through standalone > > installer? Or are they considered as "latest stable release" and thus for > > example, 7.0.1RC1 would replace 7.0.0 in package `grass`? > > > > why not just retire OSGeo4W-grass6 after grass 7.0.1 will be released? > > IMHO regarding testing/improving g7 by devs _and_ users, it's better to > have > relbranch7 dailys ready in OSGeo4W than fading out grass6. > * `grass` - latest stable release (alternatively `grass7`) * `grass6` - latest stable release of 6.x series ( * `grass6-daily` - daily build of current 6.x branch, optional) * `grass7-daily` - daily build of current 7.x branch * `grass-daily` - daily build of trunk I'm not entirely comfortable with `grass-daily` and `grass7-daily` but it would be good enough for me.
_______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev