> On Feb 22, 2015, at 3:48 AM, Helmut Kudrnovsky <hel...@web.de> wrote: > > wenzeslaus wrote >> On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 12:17 PM, Martin Landa < > >> landa.martin@ > >> > >> wrote: >> >>> 2015-02-21 17:49 GMT+01:00 Martin Landa < > >> landa.martin@ > >> >: >>>>> Except for grass6-dev: does it really make sense to still publish a >>> -dev >>>>> version of grass6 ? In my thinking we will be in pure bug fixing mode >>> for >>>>> grass6 once grass7 is out. I would actually plead to reduce to one >>> grass6 >>>>> branch on trac with bug-fixes only for that branch and bug-fix >>> releases >>> just >>>>> being tags of that branch. >>>> >>>> make sense to me. Martin >>> >>> to summarize OSGeo4W proposal: >>> >>> * `grass` will be 7.0.0 >>> * `grass6` will be 6.4.4 (hopefully soon 6.4.5) >>> * `grass-svn` will be 7.0.1svn (*) >>> * `grass-trunk-svn` will be 7.1svn >>> * `grass64-dev` will be removed >>> >>> Martin >>> >>> (*) `dev` is really misleading here, so `svn` or `daily` (`svn` sounds >>> more technical). >> >> >> I don't like svn in package names. Daily expresses much better what it is. >> It is not the current state of svn, it is a daily build. With leaving out >> the daily builds of current release branch (now 70), it would be just: >> >> * `grass` - latest stable release >> * `grass6` - latest stable release of 6.x series >> * `grass-daily` - daily build of trunk >> >> In my suggestion I suppose that we don't need to package daily builds of >> current release branch (now 70). However, I'm not sure how to deal with >> betas and RCs. Should they be also accessible just through standalone >> installer? Or are they considered as "latest stable release" and thus for >> example, 7.0.1RC1 would replace 7.0.0 in package `grass`? >> >> _______________________________________________ >> grass-dev mailing list > >> grass-dev@.osgeo > >> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev > > why not just retire OSGeo4W-grass6 after grass 7.0.1 will be released? >
+1 > IMHO regarding testing/improving g7 by devs _and_ users, it's better to have > relbranch7 dailys ready in OSGeo4W than fading out grass6. > > > > ----- > best regards > Helmut > -- > View this message in context: > http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/osgeo4w-package-for-GRASS-7-tp5189077p5189160.html > Sent from the Grass - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > grass-dev mailing list > grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev