On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 4:01 AM Markus Neteler <nete...@osgeo.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 5:40 AM Vaclav Petras <wenzesl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 5:49 PM Luca Delucchi <lucadel...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> On Thu, 21 Jan 2021 at 08:49, massimo di stefano > >> <massimodisa...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > ‘’’ > >> > I think emails (and mailing lists) are awesome, but mailing lists > are increasingly seen as archaic and not accessible > >> > ‘’’ > >> > > >> > What about migrating our mailing list to mailman3? > >> > The postorius interface looks modern and when integrated with hyper > kitty, allows an easy access to the list archives (including search and > post statistics). > >> > > >> > >> I fully agree with this proposal, but this should be done at OSGeo > >> Level, Massimo do you want to investigate this solution with SAC? > > Did anyone open a ticket for that? I didn't see it yet in case. > > > Or I can click on that one checkbox in GitHub settings. :-) > > Not sure. > Please also note that QGIS is actually closing their GitHub > Discussions for reasons also having mentioned here. > See > https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/2021-February/009244.html > If we had a presence on StackExchange like QGIS has, we wouldn't be having a discussion about GitHub Discussions in the first place.
_______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
