On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 3:59 PM Markus Neteler <nete...@osgeo.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 9:50 PM Vaclav Petras <wenzesl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 4:01 AM Markus Neteler <nete...@osgeo.org> wrote: > >> > > If we had a presence on StackExchange like QGIS has, we wouldn't be > having a discussion about GitHub Discussions in the first place. > > Try this: > > https://gis.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/grass > --> 2,027 questions > I wish this would indicate a healthy community and I wish we would have one there. However, with a small sample from questions with recent activity, I see only a couple of users answering (2 or so; BTW thanks! you know who you are) and from the 2027 questions tagged grass, there are "475 questions with no upvoted or accepted answers" [1]. This does not sound like what is in the original Nyall's email against QGIS using GitHub Discussions which says "there's LOTS of informed users answering all the QGIS questions on gis.stackexchange." [2]. Perhaps even more telling is that no one except myself [3] mentioned GIS StackExchange in this discussion up until now. [1] https://gis.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/grass?tab=Unanswered [2] https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/2021-February/009244.html [3] https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-dev/2021-January/094867.html
_______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
