Hi, Juan:

I have same feeling sometimes. Thanks for posting a Q I want to asked
too!

I like what David said "The actual language-syntax
is only a small part of this process, far more important is the
ability to break apart a problem into smaller chunks and a solid grip
on how data is stored inside a system. "

Isn't this what the daily task our architects face everyday.

I here want to share with you my experiment with component Gradient in
GH. My goal is to use Gradient to show each Grid color. By Breaking
down the problem, i found the most interesting part is component sort.
I used Sort to retrieve the Grid(start) and Grid(last) and use them to
feed Component Gradient. Now I got the color.

Hopefully this can help a little bit...
GH:
http://grasshopper3d.googlegroups.com/web/test_heightmap.ghx?gda=_n_jXkQAAAC19Ve3i4OoV9kZmG4Q4mscf6LP67pmT8Fm9ex_PJN2b2LkNB6FVP56WSlMCSfV-M9V6u9SiETdg0Q2ffAyHU-dzc4BZkLnSFWX59nr5BxGqA&gsc=oLX_ExYAAACyRrHJu5ktVEiSa4s2FPjXg-kXU5InE09W2o0GCSVgCQ

screen Shot:
http://grasshopper3d.googlegroups.com/web/test_heightMap.JPG?gda=KjGdAUQAAAC19Ve3i4OoV9kZmG4Q4mscf6LP67pmT8Fm9ex_PJN2b_yl2jkR1rL4rjuXJGJIJPBV6u9SiETdg0Q2ffAyHU-dzc4BZkLnSFWX59nr5BxGqA&gsc=oLX_ExYAAACyRrHJu5ktVEiSa4s2FPjXg-kXU5InE09W2o0GCSVgCQ



On Feb 13, 11:05 am, Juan <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi David ad Luis,
>
> Thanks for your answers guys. I think that you are right, its just
> that sometimes I get a little frustrated with what I can't do. Guess
> that I need more hard work :)
>
> Best,
> Juan
>
> On Feb 13, 11:51 am, fraguada <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Juan, David...
>
> > David, actually I think what you said is quite helpful indeed.  Many
> > times I hear students saying that "I need a script" or "I need to do
> > it in grasshopper" and I ask "why?"  In reality, all they have failed
> > to do is pick up a pen or pencil and go through what it is they really
> > want to do.  They only see the result they want to achieve, but do
> > not, as you say, break it down into manegable pieces.  So I ask you
> > Juan...what is it that you want to do?  From there will emerge
> > possible geometric relationships and logics which could then be
> > applied to the workflow.  The searching on the internet wont do much
> > good if you don't know what it is you are searching for.  So you find
> > an interesting function...so what?  Its in the process...and while we
> > can definitely accumulate knowledge and information, each process will
> > have its own logic based on the application you chose.  This will help
> > in specifying the issue you are dealing with, and in this case, this
> > google group can be quite helpful.
>
> > luis
>
> > On Feb 13, 10:45 am, David Rutten <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > Hi Juan,
>
> > > I've read the Bentley book a while back at Siggraph. The graphics are
> > > fantastic, but the explanations didn't go very deep. I'm afraid I
> > > don't have any alternatives for you though, I suspect I picked up most
> > > of geometry-sense while playing with Lego during ages 3~8. There must
> > > be excellent books out there on geometry, but I think those will only
> > > cultivate your factual knowledge, not your insight.
>
> > > Learning to use Grasshopper essentially amounts to the same thing as
> > > learning to use any programming language. The actual language-syntax
> > > is only a small part of this process, far more important is the
> > > ability to break apart a problem into smaller chunks and a solid grip
> > > on how data is stored inside a system.
>
> > > Sorry for being no help whatsoever,
> > > David
>
> > > --
> > > David Rutten
> > > [email protected]
> > > Robert McNeel & Associates
>
> > > On Feb 13, 1:22 am, Juan <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > Hello,
>
> > > > I am no expert by any means, but since I was introduced to
> > > > computational design in my master studies I have had the impression
> > > > that the software that you are using is more or less irrelevant if you
> > > > can articulate your ideas in a clear geometrical language. I have done
> > > > scripting in maya, tried houdini for its procedural workflow and right
> > > > know Im very interested in grasshopper. However I really feel like my
> > > > geometrical language is seriously lacking when I see some of the
> > > > projects that you guys generate. With this in mind I would like to
> > > > risk it and ask how/where can I find information that can enable me to
> > > > start thinking in a better way? I have seen the bentley geometry for
> > > > architects book in my ex-office, but well its a bit expensive. Maybe
> > > > there is a internet repository of algorithms or something similar that
> > > > can help people like me, that did not have the luck to have a good
> > > > partner/teacher willing to share this information and instead is
> > > > trying to learn on his own based on web tutorials and the like.
>
> > > > Hope that I made sense.
>
> > > > Best,
> > > > Juan

Reply via email to