oompa, Are you talking about the gaps visible from the blog screenshot?
http://culagovski.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/screenhunter_06-oct-06-0955.jpg My first instinct would be that you would need to get the surface border curves, cull the vertex in question (causing the bump), and rebuild the border as 3 lines. That would eliminate the gap for adjacent subdivisions of the same size. Then you could test the midpoint/quarter points/eighth points of each line with <Closest Point> to cinch up the gap of any smaller adjacent subdivisions within a given tolerance. That would take care of the gaps between between scalar subdivisions (maybe...) to a specified subdivision level. Or you could probably script this to make it truly parametric. -taz On Apr 21, 6:08 pm, oompa_l <[email protected]> wrote: > I was missing an "End Sub", now it works... > > Anyone have any bright ideas on a good way to force continuity between > unequally subdivided faces? There are gaps at the junctions because a > greater subdivided area has evaluated more points...Anyways, it would > be great if somehow those edge conditions were forced to meet up with > their neighbours. > > any ideas are greatly welcomed! > thanks
