On Apr 17, 2012, at 2:00 PM, Robert Raszuk wrote: > I guess the fact that we use TCP for BGP is sort of legacy and perhaps the > more Shakespeare we put in BGP (on 179 or different instance) we should > revisit how we transport the UPDATE messages betwen BGP peers.
Before you go there, you need to ask yourself if you want to continue to have a protocol with incremental updates. TCP is there precisely to support that. If you want to go back to periodic updates, then getting rid of TCP seems much more credible. But then the overhead become untenable. Tony _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list GROW@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
