There was a question in the PR about how we're handling authentication, but
in an attempt to keep all design discussion in this thread, I'm going to
answer it here.

The current proposal does not attempt to address proxy authentication.  I
know that this is something that Eric has been considering for Java, since
there are issues there related to finding the proxy via Java system
properties that may assume that you are also using Java system properties
for authentication to the proxy.  In the other languages, we have not
attempted to address this at all, but it's probably something that we
should have a cross-language design for.

I don't want to hold up the current proposal on this feature, but we can
probably try to put together a follow-up proposal to address this sometime
in the next couple of quarters.

On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 2:12 PM, Mark D. Roth <r...@google.com> wrote:

> I've created a gRFC describing how HTTP CONNECT proxies will be supported
> in gRPC:
>
> https://github.com/grpc/proposal/pull/4
>
> Please keep discussion in this thread.  Thanks!
>
> --
> Mark D. Roth <r...@google.com>
> Software Engineer
> Google, Inc.
>



-- 
Mark D. Roth <r...@google.com>
Software Engineer
Google, Inc.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"grpc.io" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to grpc-io+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to grpc-io@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/grpc-io.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/grpc-io/CAJgPXp5ffBVgD1RUvPuTTP341Q05NFgqnFi33TUroAz%2B4p4Viw%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to