No, there are no Win32 binaries in MSYS2. Where are you getting your information?
On 5/4/2016 at 12:29 AM, Florian Pelz <pelzflor...@pelzflorian.de> wrote: >On 05/04/2016 02:22 AM, Andrew Robinson wrote: >> I have an idea! Why doesn't someone just compile all the binaries for Win32 >> and Win64 and make them available on the Internet, that way none of us will >> have to go through all this stupid BS just to get some binaries? Just two >> packages, one for Win32 and one for Win64, using only just the command line >> options that >> https://blogs.gnome.org/nacho/2014/08/01/how-to-build-your-gtk-application-on-windows/ >> tell us to use. > >All the binaries are available and maintained in MSYS2. No need to >duplicate work. > >If you want a newer Glib, you can try modifying the PKGBUILD and see if >it still works [1]. The version already seems right though. > >You can also just download gedit for Windows, remove gedit.exe and put >in your .exe. You won't need some of the libraries and it's not very >clean and maintainable, but it's a quick hack to get a working GTK+. > >And yes, Windows support could be a little cleaner and better >documented. It's not that bad though, people are working on it, and I'm >sure they'd appreciate help. > >However, it seems many just ignore the LGPL when it comes to source code >distribution? Of course when using an unmodified version of glibc/GTK+/… >you can just find the library version you used and fetch the source code >from the upstream website when needed, but that may mean more work in >the future. > >[1] https://github.com/Alexpux/MINGW-packages/tree/master/mingw-w64-glib2 > >_______________________________________________ >gtk-app-devel-list mailing list >gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org >https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list _______________________________________________ gtk-app-devel-list mailing list gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list
