Hi Felix,
> On Wed, Nov 01 2023, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > >> What do you think about changing “guix package” and/or “guix copy” to >> better support deployment of remote profiles? > > As someone who uses 'guix deploy' all the time. I believe remote > administration is one of our core strengths and selling points. Other > remote administration tools like Ansible or Puppet are probably no > longer needed when using GNU Guix System. > > I currently have only x86_64 equipment deployed, so there is no > cross-building happening in my setup. Is that the main purpose of your > proposal? No, both machines are x86_64. I think “guix deploy” could benefit from a way to not only deploy Guix System (which makes the tool primarily useful for managing hosts, not applications) but also profiles and containers. -- Ricardo
