Gabriel Wicki <[email protected]> writes: > I want to thank everyone who has already taken part in the discussion of > GCD007. I think we are getting closer and closer to reaching a > fixed-point of this iterative process. I've updated and enriched GCD007 > quite a bit hoping to eliminate sources of obscurity. The document is > now rather wordy. > > I have added an "Open Issues" section (as intended) to the very bottom > of the document. > > I once again ask any and all of you to read it with the request for > comments. By now I figured that I prefer responses via email, but using > the codeberg infrastructure is ok as well.
I've had a read of the current draft, I'm having a hard time trying to
gather my thoughts though.
I think some of my previous comments have still been addressed, but I
still have issues regarding some of the language used ("trusted elders",
"who is in charge", ...) and more importantly I still don't think that
the potential benefits I can see from these changes outweigh the risks.
The difficulties in the discussion period also don't help mitigate any
of my concerns about the substance of the GCD.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
