On Tue, Apr 21, 2026 at 11:35 AM Simon Tournier <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Gabriel, > > As sponsor I should not raise my voice too loud and try to keep the > discussion on rail. From what I’ve read, the discussion has been on > rail and has not required interventions aside being timekeepers.
The train may be on rail but is stuck on the track as substantive discussion never got moving. > That said, as expressed by people using different angles, I’m also > confused by this GCD. When reading the GCD, my impression is that the > GCD is trying to chase more than one rabbit and then I feel lost. How did this happen? I would have assumed that sponsors would read and comment on the document during the submission period before offering to support. >From GCD 001: "Authors may withdraw their GCD at any time; they can resubmit it again later (under a new GCD number)".
